Treatment Patterns with Mirabegron and Antimuscarinics for Overactive Bladder: A Prospective, Registry Study in Taiwan and South Korea (FAITH).

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess overactive bladder (OAB) treatment patterns and factors associated with effectiveness and persistence. METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal, observational registry study of adults starting OAB therapy with mirabegron or antimuscarinics was undertaken. Primary endpoints were time from treatment initiation to discontinuation/switching; proportion who discontinued/switched; and reasons for discontinuation/switching. Secondary endpoints included OAB Symptom Score (OABSS), OAB Questionnaire: Short Form, and OAB Bladder Assessment Tool scores; factors associated with effectiveness and persistence; and safety. RESULTS: In total, 556 patients initiating mirabegron and 250 initiating antimuscarinics were enrolled. There was no treatment switch, change, or discontinuation in 68.5% of the mirabegron initiator group and median time to treatment change was not reached. Mean initial treatment duration was 130.8 days. In multivariable models, baseline OABSS was the only variable significantly associated with change from baseline in OABSS, and patients with mild and moderate OAB had significantly better persistence with mirabegron than those with severe OAB. Urinary tract infection was the most common adverse event with mirabegron. There was no treatment switch, change, or discontinuation in 60.4% of the antimuscarinics initiator group and median time to treatment change was not reached. Solifenacin was the most frequent initial treatment (66.0%). Mean treatment duration was 122.2 days. In multivariable models, baseline OABSS was the only variable significantly associated with change from baseline in OABSS, while patients with OAB medication in the 12 months before enrollment had significantly better persistence with antimuscarinics than those with no previous OAB medication. Dry mouth was the most common adverse event with antimuscarinics. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron and solifenacin were commonly prescribed as first-line OAB medications. There was no treatment switch, change, or discontinuation in more than 60% of the mirabegron initiator and antimuscarinics initiator groups. Mean initial treatment duration was 130.8 days and 122.2 days for mirabegron and antimuscarinics, respectively. Graphical Abstract available for this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03572231.

Comparison of mirabegron and vibegron for clinical efficacy and safety in female patients with overactive bladder: a multicenter prospective randomized crossover trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of mirabegron and vibegron in female OAB patients. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized crossover study of female patients with OAB. The patients were assigned to Group MV (mirabegron for 8 weeks, followed by vibegron for 8 weeks) or group VM (vibegron for 8 weeks, followed by mirabegron for 8 weeks). The primary endpoint was the change in OABSS from baseline, and the secondary endpoint was the change in FVC parameters. After completion of the study, each patient was asked which drug was preferable. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients were enrolled (40 and 43 in groups MV and VM, respectively). At 8th and 16th week, 33 and 29 in Group MV and 34 and 27 in Group VM continued to receive the treatment. The change in PVR was not significantly different between treatment with mirabegron and vibegron. The changes in OABSS, nighttime frequency, mean, and maximum voided volume were similar between mirabegron and vibegron. The mean change in the daytime frequency was greater in the vibegron than in the mirabegron. Of the 56 patients, 15 (27%) and 30 (53%) preferred mirabegron and vibegron, respectively. The remaining 11 patients (20%) showed no preference. The change in the urgency incontinence score during vibegron was better in patients who preferred vibegron to mirabegron. CONCLUSION: The efficacies of mirabegron and vibegron in female patients was similar. The patients' preference for vibegron could depend on the efficacy of vibegron for urgency incontinence.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of onabotulinum toxin A and mirabegron for overactive bladder in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of mirabegron and onabotulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) injections for overactive bladders. The treatment we provided was to patients over the age of 65 years who were not satisfied with the results of anticholinergic monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted between March 2017 and December 2021. Thirty patients who were unable to take anticholinergics or mirabegron due to side effects received a total of 100-unit intravesical injections of BoNT/A. Furthermore, 30 patients receiving 50 mg of mirabegron daily were compared. Micturition frequency, urgency of urinary incontinence, pad usage, and nocturia were all evaluated for efficacy. Patients' health-related quality of life and subjective satisfaction ratings were assessed before and six months after treatment using an incontinence-quality-of-life questionnaire. We documented all adverse events for all subjects. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in the frequency, daily pad usage, and incontinence episodes of both groups. The median (interquartile range) voiding frequency after onabotulinum toxin A treatment was lower than that after mirabegron treatment [9.4 (6.83-10.0) vs. 10.5 (8.37-11.67); p = 0.01]. Incontinence episodes showed similar differences [1.3 (1.17-3.67) vs. 2.53 (2.0-5.67); p = 0.05]. There was no significant difference in nocturia or maximum urine flow rate between the groups before and after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We determined that mirabegron led to lower urinary retention, hematuria, infection and post-void residual urine volume rates than BoNT/A in the older patient population. In addition, mirabegron treatment had comparable incontinence-quality-of-life scores at six months post-treatment.

A randomized controlled trial study on effectiveness between tadalafil versus combination mirabegron and solifenacin on treatment of ureteral stent-related symptoms.

Introduction: ureteral stents have common complications like ureteral stent-related symptoms (SRSs). This study investigated the effectiveness of tadalafil compared to mirabegron and solifenacin combination therapy in patients with ureteral SRSs after double-J (DJ) stent insertion. Methods: this double-blind, randomized clinical trial used consecutive random sampling in participants with SRSs after double-J stent insertion. The study was conducted at four different hospitals in Makassar, Indonesia, from July to December 2020. Ureteral stent-related morbidity indices which analyzed include urinary symptoms, pain, general health, quality of work, and sex scores. All of the indices were measured by ureteral symptom score questionnaire for the first, second, third, and fourth weeks after drug consumption, either tadalafil 10 mg/day (group A, n=25) and a combination of mirabegron 25 mg/day and solifenacin 5 mg/day (group B, n=28). Results: before the treatment procedure, the groups were comparable in age, gender, body mass index, DJ stent procedures, type, and indication. In general, the score in all parameters declined over the follow-up time for both groups. Group A had a lower urinary symptom score than group B at week III and week IV (all p-value < 0.001). In addition, group A had a lower pain score, general condition, work activity, and other complaints than group B at week II, week III, and week IV (all p-value <0.001). The sexual activity score is comparable between the group, except in week I. Conclusion: according to our results, we suggest tadalafil to minimize stent-related urinary symptoms and improve general health in patients with double J stent.

Effect of Terazosin Hydrochloride Combined with Interventional Embolisation on Prostate Volume and Quality of Life of Elderly Patients with Prostatic Hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effect of terazosin hydrochloride combined with interventional embolisation on prostate volume and quality of life (QOL) of elderly patients with prostatic hyperplasia (PH). METHODS: The clinical data of 175 elderly patients with PH admitted to Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from July 2020 to July 2022 were selected for retrospective analysis. Based on different treatment regimens, 89 patients who received interventional embolisation alone were included in the control group (CG), and 86 patients undergoing interventional embolisation combined with terazosin hydrochloride were included in the study group (SG). The prostate volume, serum indicators, adverse reactions and QOL of the two groups before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Before treatment, no significant difference in 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) scores, serum tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was observed in both groups (p > 0.05). After treatment, the SF-36 score in the SG was 78.20 ± 6.84 points, which was significantly higher than that in the CG (72.67 ± 5.94 points). In addition, the SG had remarkably lower residual urine volume and prostate volume, higher maximum flow rate and lower TNF-α and PSA levels compared with the CG (p < 0.05). The adverse reaction rate of the SG was only 4.65%, which was significantly lower than that of the CG (14.61%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Terazosin hydrochloride combined with interventional embolisation overtly reduces the prostate volume and improves the clinical symptoms of patients with fewer side effects, which has a certain clinical application value.

Tamsulosin vs. Tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is recommended for distal ureteral stones from 5 to 10 mm. The best drug for MET is still uncertain. In this review, we aim to compare the effectiveness of tadalafil and tamsulosin for distal ureteral stones from 5 to 10 mm in terms of stone expulsion rate (SER), stone expulsion time (SET) and the side effect profile. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science, from inception until April 2023. Only randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Eleven publications with 1,330 patients were included. We observed that tadalafil has a higher SER (OR 0.55, CI 95% 0.38;0.80, p=0.02, I2=52%) and the same efficacy in SET (MD 1.07, CI 95% -0.25; 2.39, p=0.11, I2=84%). No differences were found when comparing side effects as headache, backache, dizziness, and orthostatic hypotension. CONCLUSION: Tadalafil has a higher stone expulsion rate than tamsulosin as a medical expulsive therapy for patients with distal stones from 5 to 10 mm without differences in side effects.

Comparative safety of antimuscarinics versus mirabegron for overactive bladder in Parkinson disease.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common non-motor symptom of Parkinson disease (PD), often treated with antimuscarinics or beta-3 agonists. There is lack of evidence to guide OAB management in PD. OBJECTIVES: To assess the comparative safety of antimuscarinics versus beta-3 agonists for OAB treatment in PD. METHODS: We employed a new-user, active-comparator cohort study design. We included Medicare beneficiaries age ≥65 years with PD who were new users of either antimuscarinic or beta-3 agonist. The primary outcome was any acute care encounter (i.e., non-elective hospitalization or emergency department visit) within 90 days of OAB drug initiation. The main secondary outcome was a composite measure of acute care encounters for anticholinergic related adverse events (AEs). Matching on high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) was used to address potential confounding. We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association between OAB drug category and outcomes. We repeated analyses for 30- and 180-day follow-up periods. RESULTS: We identified 27,091 individuals meeting inclusion criteria (mean age: 77.8 years). After hdPS matching, antimuscarinic users had increased risks for any acute care encounter (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.37) and encounters for anticholinergic related AEs (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.34) compared to beta-3 agonist users. Similar associations were observed for sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Among persons with PD, anticholinergic initiation was associated with a higher risk of acute care encounters compared with beta-3 agonist initiation. The long-term safety of anticholinergic vs. beta-3 agonist therapy in the PD population should be evaluated in a prospective study.

Persistence of overactive bladder pharmacological treatment in women as reflected from large-scale real-world data of prescription claims: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Medical treatments for overactive bladder (OAB) have proven efficacy in controlled trials. However, 1-year treatment persistence is reported to be as low as 25% for anticholinergics and 40% for ß3 agonists. Real-world data on treatment continuation and treatment sequence is limited. Therefore, we aimed to study treatment persistence trends in women initiated on OAB medications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used advanced data-mining techniques to query the largest regional provider's medication purchase database, dispensing for patients, for all women initiating OAB pharmacotherapy between 2010 and 2020. Treatment persistence was measured as days in which the patient was in possession of medication and nonpersistence was defined as prescription nonrefilling for 90 days. We employed a Sankey diagram to explore trends in OAB medication acquisition and treatment sequence. We compared treatment persistence using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and pairwise log-rank analysis. RESULTS: Here, 46 079 women made 791 681 unique claims of OAB medications. Only 39% of the patients tried more than one OAB formulation, including dose change. The overall persistence rate for all drugs was 55% in 30 days, 46% in 90 days, and 37% per year. The persistence rate for Mirabegron at 30 days was 54%, 42% at 90 days, and 17% at 1 year. Overall, persistence rates were unchanged when stratifying by the time Mirabegron insurance acceptance into coverage (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world OAB pharmacotherapy persistence rates are lower than previously reported. The introduction of Mirabegron did not seem to improve these rates or affect the treatment sequence.

[Assessment of prescribing practices in overactive bladder pharmacotherapy across different specialties of India: a prescription trend analysis].

PURPOSE: To assess the prescribing practices for overactive bladder (OAB) pharmacotherapy based on the prescription trend analysis across different specialties of India. METHOD: s: IQVIA (Quintiles and IMS Health) secondary sales audit (SSA), as well as a prescription audit for antimuscarinics and beta-3 adrenoceptor agonists (mirabegron) from 2014 to 2021, were analyzed. The data includes SSA data of various antimuscarinics like solifenacin, oxybutynin, tolterodine, darifenacin, trospium and mirabegron change in the prescription trend of antimuscarinics and mirabegron across different specialties; prescribers overlap analysis for solifenacin and mirabegron among Indian urologists were also analyzed. RESULTS: Urologists prescription rates of OAB drugs were 65% in 2016 and 54% in 2021. The rate of OAB medication prescription by non-urologist was highest from the surgeon (11%), followed by gynecologists (9%) and consultant physicians (8%) in 2021. In addition, among OAB medication prescription rates for antimuscarinics were 100% in 2016 and 58% in 2021 whereas for mirabegron, it was 0% in 2016 and 42% in 2021. Solifenacin was most frequently prescribed anticholinergics, followed by oxybutynin, tolterodine, darifenacin, and trospium. The proportion of prescribers of OAB medication among urologists was 38% in 2016 and 33% in 2021. Exclusive prescribers of solifenacin were 748 in 2018 and 739 in 2021 at the urologist, whereas for mirabegron, it was 961 in 2018 and 934 in 2021. The compound annual growth rate for prescription of the last 6 years (from 2016-2021) for solifenacin and mirabegron was -3% and 8% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Urology remained a top prescribing specialty for OAB drugs, although prescription share increased at surgeon and consultant physician. OAB medicines prescriptions by urologists are shifting from leading antimuscarinic solifenacin to beta-agonist mirabegron. Data from this study will ultimately lead to the OAB medication preference by the specialist that could lead to more advanced OAB management.

Mirabegron versus vibegron in previously untreated female patients with overactive bladder: A randomized, single-clinic, open-label trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of mirabegron compared with vibegron (both 50 mg once daily) in Japanese female patients with symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: This prospective, 12-week, two-arm, parallel-group, open-label randomized trial (UMIN000038288) was conducted at a single clinic from December 2019 to September 2022. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the change in mean total overactive bladder symptom scores (OABSSs) from baseline to end of treatment (EOT) (Week 12). The secondary efficacy outcome measures were changes in mean International Prostate Symptom Score from baseline to EOT, the ratio of patients who achieved a minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of total OABSS, and individual domains of the King's Health Questionnaire. Safety assessments, such as adverse events (AEs), postvoid residual volume, and patient-reported incidences, were recorded at every visit. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant adjusted mean difference between mirabegron and vibegron in terms of the primary outcome of the mean change from baseline to EOT in the total OABSS. The difference in the percentage of patients in the mirabegron and vibegron groups achieving an MCIC on the total OABSS was not statistically significant but appeared to be clinically important. The incidence of treatment-related AEs was significantly higher for the vibegron group (38.5%) than the mirabegron group (19.1%) (p = .047). CONCLUSIONS: These results showed that both drugs were effective in female OAB patients, with no significant differences in terms of efficacy. However, the safety of vibegron requires further investigation.

A treatment prediction strategy for overactive bladder using a machine learning algorithm that utilized data from the FAITH study.

AIMS: To use machine learning algorithms to develop a model to accurately predict treatment responses to mirabegron or antimuscarinic agents in patients with overactive bladder (OAB), using real-world data from the FAITH registry (NCT03572231). METHODS: The FAITH registry data included patients who had been diagnosed with OAB symptoms for at least 3 months and were due to initiate monotherapy with mirabegron or any antimuscarinic. For the development of the machine learning model, data from patients were included if they had completed the 183-day study period, had data for all timepoints and had completed the overactive bladder symptom scores (OABSS) at baseline and end of study. The primary outcome of the study was a composite outcome combining efficacy, persistence, and safety outcomes. Treatment was deemed "more effective" if the composite outcome criteria for "successful," "no treatment change," and "safe" were met, otherwise treatment was deemed "less effective." To explore the composite algorithm, a total of 14 clinical risk factors were included in the initial data set and a 10-fold cross-validation procedure was performed. A range of machine learning models were evaluated to determine the most effective algorithm. RESULTS: In total, data from 396 patients were included (266 [67.2%] treated with mirabegron and 130 [32.8%] treated with an antimuscarinic). Of these, 138 (34.8%) were in the "more effective" group and 258 (65.2%) were in the "less effective" group. The groups were comparable in terms of their characteristic distributions across patient age, sex, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Of the six models initially selected and tested, the decision tree (C5.0) model was chosen for further optimization, and the receiver operating characteristic of the final optimized model had an area under the curve result of 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.85) when 15 was used for the min n parameter. CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully created a simple, rapid, and easy-to-use interface that could be further refined to produce a valuable educational or clinical decision-making aid.

Mirabegron is better tolerated than solifenacin in Sjogren's syndrome patients with overactive bladder symptoms-A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the efficacy and adverse events of beta-3 agonists and antimuscarinic agents for managing overactive bladder syndrome in Sjogren syndrome. METHODS: Sjogren's syndrome patients with an Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) >5 were enrolled and were randomly assigned to mirabegron 50 mg/day or solifenacin 5 mg/day. Patients were evaluated on the recruitment day and reassessed at Week 1, 2, 4, and 12. The study's primary endpoint was to have a significant change in OABSS at Week 12. The secondary endpoint was the adverse event and crossover rate. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were included in the final analysis, with 24 in the mirabegron group and 17 in the solifenacin group. The study's primary outcome was a change of the OABSS at Week 12. We found that both mirabegron and solifenacin significantly reduce patients' OABSS after 12 weeks of treatment. The evolution of the OABSS was -3.08 for mirabegron and -3.71 for solifenacin (p = .56). Six out of 17 patients from the solifenacin group crossed over to the mirabegron arm due to severe dry mouth or constipation, while none from the mirabegron arm crossed over to the solifenacin group. Sjogren's syndrome-related pain was also improved in the mirabegron group (4.96-1.67, p = .008) compared to the solifenacin group (4.39-3.4, p = .49). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that mirabegron is equally effective as solifenacin in treating Sjogren's syndrome patients with overactive bladder. Mirabegron is superior to solifenacin in terms of treatment-related adverse events.

Urodynamic parameter improvements after mirabegron vs. antimuscarinics agents in non-neurogenic overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effect.

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to establish the comparison between mirabegron and antimuscarinic agents through the improvement of the urodynamic study (UDS) parameter among overactive bladder (OAB) populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PRISMA checklist and procedure were utilized to standardize our review of studies from scientific databases published between January 2013 and May 2022 in accordance with the applied eligibility criteria. This study mainly focused on UDS parameter improvement; hence, baseline and follow-up completion were mandatory to be included. The quality of each included study was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool in RevMan 5.4.1. RESULTS: We included a total of 5 clinical trials encompassing 430 clinically confirmed OAB individuals. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the improvement of maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) was more apparent in the mirabegron arm [mean difference (MD), 1.78 (1.31, 2.26); p<0.05] compared to antimuscarinics arm [MD, 0.02 (-2.53, 2.57); p>0.05) as analyzed in random-effect model (REM) analysis within 95% CI. Similar outcomes were also observed on the other UDS parameters related to the bladder's storage function, e.g., post-void residual (PVR) and detrusor overactivity (DO) cases, with most of the MDs favoring mirabegron. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron is superior in improving most of the UDS parameter outcomes compared to the antimuscarinics agents though the current guideline should always refer to symptoms improvement. Emphasizing the role of UDS parameter measurements to objectively confirm a therapeutic effect should be considered in the upcoming studies.

Comparative study between Tamsulosin, Silodosin and Tadalafil as a medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteral stones.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of Tamsulosin, Silodosin and Tadalafil as a medical expulsive therapy for treatment of distal ureteral calculi. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a period of 6 months (January 2022 to June 2022) this prospective randomized study was conducted on 170 patients with distal ureteric stone ≤ 10 mm. Patients were randomly divided into three groups. Patients in group A received Tamsulosin 0.4mg, in group B received Silodosin, and in group C receive Tadalafil 5 mg. Therapy was given for a maximum of 4 weeks. The rate and time of stone expulsion, the analgesic use, attacks of colic and hospital visits for pain, and adverse effects of drugs were recorded. RESULTS: Among 170 patients who were enrolled in study, 20 were lost to follow-up (7, 8, 5 in group A, B, And C respective-ly). There was a significant higher stone passage rate in group C than group A and B (90% vs. 70% and 76% respectively; p-value = 0.043) and shorter expulsion time in group C (8.7 ± 3.3 days) vs. group A (12.5 ± 5.2 days) and group B (11.3 ± 4.2 days) with (p-value = 0.001)(highly statistically significant with p-value < 0.001) and increased amount of analgesics required in group A (225 ± 115.7 mg) and group B (163 ± 77.5 mg) when compared with group C (120 ± 55.3 mg). CONCLUSION: Tadalafil is more effective than Tamsulosin and Silodosin in treatment of patients with distal ureteric stones ≤ 10 mm as regard stone expulsion rate, expulsion time with decreased number of colicky episodes and side effects.

Study UNICO: Perception of Urologists and Andrologists, in Spain, about the Use of Sildenafil Oral Suspension in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction

Objective: To describe the profile of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED), attending to consultation and satisfaction using sildenafil oral suspension, from the specialist’s perception. Materials and methods: This is a nationwide multicenter, epidemiological, descriptive and observational study, with the studied population as the unit of study. Thirty urologists and/or andrologists completed a questionnaire with questions about ED patients’ profile attending to their practice, sildenafil oral suspension perception of effectiveness and safeness, and their opinion about patients’ satisfaction after sildenafil oral suspension treatment. Aggregate data were collected for the last 6 patients treated or on treatment with sildenafil oral suspension. Results: Overall, 40.9% and 24.9% of patients had moderate or severe ED, respectively. Among the patients, 73.6% were older than 50 years. The disease progression was approximately one year (11.8 months). ED etiology was mostly organic (38.1%) and mixed (31.8%). Cardiovascular comorbidities were present in 57.4%, mental health problems in 16.4% and hormonal disorders in 10.2% of the patients. The main reason for choosing sildenafil oral suspension was the ease of dose adjustment. The specialists considered that 73.4% of the patients responded satisfactorily to treatment. They also rated the perceived effectiveness and safeness of the product as very good or good. Conclusions: Urologists and andrologists consider that most patients with ED achieve a high degree of satisfaction with sildenafil oral suspension. The main advantage of the treatment is the possibility of adjusting the dose according to patient’s needs and circumstances (AU)

Comparison of Mirabegron and Vibegron in Women With Treatment-Naive Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of mirabegron versus vibegron in postmenopausal women with treatment-naïve overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled study of women with treatment-naïve OAB. The patients received mirabegron or vibegron at 50 mg daily for 12 weeks by a stratified randomized method. The OAB symptom score (OABSS) and quality of life (QOL) index were evaluated before and 4 and 12 weeks after the treatment. The patients' 3-day voiding diary and postvoided residual urine volumes were evaluated before and 12 weeks after the treatment. RESULTS: Of 213 patients initially enrolled in this study, 199 patients were randomized to the mirabegron group (n = 97) or vibegron group (n = 102). Twelve weeks after the treatment, OABSS, QOL index, the numbers of micturition, urgency episodes, incontinence episodes, and voided volume per 24 hours were significantly improved compared with the baseline in both groups, and there was no significant difference in the rate of change in both groups. The postvoid residual urine volume was not significantly different in the 2 groups at 12 weeks. Discontinuation because of adverse effects was observed in 6.2% of patients in the mirabegron group and 6.8% in the vibegron group, with no significant difference between 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Both mirabegron at 50 mg and vibegron at 50 mg improved OAB symptoms and the parameters of voiding diary equally in postmenopausal women with treatment naïve OAB.

Does metabolic syndrome influence the efficacy of mirabegron treatment in female patients with overactive bladder?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to determine whether the presence of metabolic syndrome (MS) affects the efficacy of mirabegron in treatment-naïve women with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: Women being treated with mirabegron 50 mg were allocated to MS and non-MS groups, and the efficacy of treatment of OAB was compared using the OAB symptom score (OABSS) and a 3-day voiding diary before and 12 weeks after starting treatment. The Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests and multivariate logistic regression were used for statistical analyses, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered to represent statistical significance. RESULTS: Of the 197 patients who completed the trial, 43 (23.9%) had MS. After 12 weeks of mirabegron treatment, both the MS and non-MS groups showed significant improvements in OABSS score, the number of incontinence episodes/24 h, the number of micturition episodes/24 h, and the number of episodes of urgency/24 h. The factors associated with clinically important differences in OABSS were the presence of hyperglycemia (odds ratio 2.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-5.60) and OABSS score at baseline (odds ratio 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.39). CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron is effective in patients with and without MS, and comorbid hyperglycemia and severe OAB symptoms before treatment are predictors of the efficacy of mirabegron treatment.

Evolving Role of Silodosin for the Treatment of Urological Disorders - A Narrative Review.

Use of α-androgenic receptor blockers remains a mainstay therapeutic approach for the treatment of urological diseases. Silodosin is recommended over other α-blockers for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), due to its high α1A uroselectivity. Current research data suggest that silodosin is efficacious in the management of various urological diseases. Thus, we herein review the current evidence of silodosin related to its efficacy and tolerability and appraise the available literature that might ultimately aid in management of various urological conditions at routine clinical practice. Literature reveals that silodosin is beneficial in improving nocturia events related to LUTS/BPH. Silodosin exerts effect on relaxing muscles involved in detrusor obstruction, therefore prolonging the need for patients undergoing invasive surgery. Silodosin treatment, either as a monotherapy or combination, significantly improves International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) including both storage and voiding symptoms in patients with BPH/LUTS. Patients on other treatment therapies such as phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors or other α-blockers are well managed with this drug. Steadily, silodosin has proved beneficial in the treatment of other urological disorders such as chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), overactive bladder/acute urinary retention (AUR), premature ejaculation (PE), and prostate cancer post brachytherapy-induced progression. In patients with distal ureteral stones, silodosin treatment is beneficial in decreasing stone expulsion time without affecting stone expulsion rate or analgesic need. Moreover, there were significant improvements in intravaginal ejaculation latency time, quality of life scores, and decrease in PE profile among patients with PE. Silodosin has also demonstrated promising results in increasing the likelihood of successful trial without catheter in patients with AUR and those taking antihypertensive drugs. Reports from Phase II studies have shown promising role of silodosin in the treatment of CP/CPPS as well as facilitating ureteral stone passage. From the robust data in this review, further silodosin treatment strategies in the management of different urological conditions need to be focused on.

Mirabegron and antimuscarinic use in frail overactive bladder patients in the United States Medicare population.

INTRODUCTION: Overactive bladder (OAB) and frailty are independently associated with patient burden. However, economic burden and treatment-taking behavior have not been well characterized among frail patients with OAB, which, given the varying safety and tolerability profiles of available treatments, is crucial. OBJECTIVES: To assess costs, health care resource utilization, treatment-taking behavior (persistence and adherence) to OAB medication in older, frail OAB patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using international business machines MarketScan Medicare Supplemental claims data. Eligible frail patients (per Claims-based Frailty Index score) initiating mirabegron were 1:2 propensity score matched (based on age, sex, and other characteristics) with those initiating antimuscarinics and were followed up to 1 year. All-cause, per-person, per-month costs, health care encounters, persistence (median days to discontinuation assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods) and adherence (≥80% of proportion of days covered at Day 365) were compared. RESULTS: From 2527 patients with incident mirabegron (21%) or antimuscarinic (79%) dispensations, 516 incident mirabegron users (median age: 82 years, 64% female) were matched to 1032 incident antimuscarinic users (median age: 81 years, 62% female). Median cost was higher in mirabegron group ($1581 vs. $1197 per month); this was primarily driven by medication cost. There was no difference in medical encounters. Adherence (39.1% vs. 33.8%) and persistence (103 vs. 90 days) were higher in mirabegron users. CONCLUSIONS: Among frail older adults with OAB, mirabegron use was associated with higher costs and potential improvements in treatment-taking behaviors, particularly with respect to treatment adherence, versus those initiating antimuscarinics.

Impact of mirabegron versus solifenacin on autonomic function and arterial stiffness in female overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

The study aims to elucidate the impact of mirabegron versus solifenacin on autonomic function and peripheral arterial conditions in women with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). All consecutive women with OAB were randomized to receive 12 weeks of mirabegron 25 mg or solifenacin 5 mg once per day. Heart rate variability, cardio-ankle vascular index, ankle-brachial pressure index, blood pressure, and heart rate were compared between the two groups. There were 87 women (mirabegron, n = 43; and solifenacin, n = 44) who completed 12-week treatment and underwent heart rate variability examination. Systolic blood pressure (median: - 4.5 to - 5.5 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (median: - 0.5 to - 3.5 mmHg) decreased after solifenacin treatment, and heart rate (median: + 2 bpm) increased after mirabegron treatment, despite of no between-group difference. In addition, posttreatment heart rate variability, cardio-ankle vascular index, and ankle-brachial pressure index did not differ compared with baseline; and there were no between-group differences. In conclusion, solifenacin might decrease blood pressure, and mirabegron might increase heart rate. Nonetheless, there were no significant impacts of 12-week mirabegron versus solifenacin treatment on autonomic function and arterial stiffness.